SO YOU SAY SHARIA LAW WILL NEVER COME TO USA?
79. . . . .Sharia ordered through Florida Court
For those of you who do not believe there is a creep into our country by Islam as they push their agenda of Sharia Law, well here it is. One of our US courts ordered that a matter be resolved by Sharia Law. .
Those of us who know that the Muslim Brotherhood is dangerous and pushing to annihilate the western world as we know it have been told that we are bigoted and phobic, well what on earth is this? Why do we need to use another country’s laws from the dark ages in our country when we have laws that all citizens are required to follow.
Muslims consider their law to be superior to ours, and their positions in our country special. They are Supremacists of the highest order. The technique of the Islam stealth is to remain fairly unobtrusive until they populate the country so heavily they can infiltrate the government and schools and all facets of our society. Once they outnumber a country they can by force implement their backward, cruel and racist agenda.
In this article I have included a few pictures of once beautiful young women subjected to Sharia Law as well as a photo of an entire New York Street being block by praying Muslims, not because it was necessary and they had no place to pray. No, they bussed in people so they could block traffic and once again demonstrate their superiority. It’s the same attitude that the grown zero mosque Imam has. They want the mosque at ground zero and they don’t care who it hurts and they extend their hand and smile as they call this intrusion community outreach. It’s the same aggression being shown by the Muslims in New York where despite city ordinances they have started construction of a big mosque in the middle of a quiet residential neighborhood. These people are dangerous and intrusive.
So, you say not all of them are radical. This is true, not until they heavily populate and overtake a community. Until then they smile, hold out their hands and use TAQUIYYA, the art of lying in order to further their religious agenda, the stealthy creep of Sharia.
I find this disgusting, as disgusting as this absolutely enormous Mosque, the biggest in all USA, in Michigan.
Someone needs to stop the building of Mosques in this country. They are breeding grounds for jihadists and terrorists, and we need to stop their immigration to this country.
The actual court order is pictured here.
WAKE UP AMERICA!
CommentsLoading...
I know that reasonable, peaceful Muslims exist. I'm finding them and I will write about them some day. I know of one editor that went to jail for l7 years for putting into print the need for change in his religion. thank you for reading my hub and commenting.
Hey, that's a neat story to hear :). Thank you for this courageous hub!
ms, Yesterday a judge said he would go by Sharia law. I wish I could remember his name. H
It's the Florida judge, the one adjudicating the law suit that I have photographed above
ms, He should be removed from the bench, for not adjudicting the law. H
I agree. I wonder if these liberal judges that want to use Sharia law now and then will need to go back to law school. I mean what do they know about Sharia Law?
ms, That's a very good points. All judges, lawyers and students would have to take classes. So would every elected person, except Obama. H
Obama already knows the Sharia law, maybe?
ms, Then maybe he beats her. Nah, she would kick his ass!
H
Yes, Harvey, she is a large woman and the media is constantly talking about her powerful arms. Also she has a private trainer that works out with her. They fly him in from Chicago several times a week. Let's see now was it Obama that said we all need to cut back?
Ha! They said that was to short. Let's see now. H
EXactly!
I really wish you put up an educated argument instead of passing off the minority as the general rule of thumb. All of what you've shown is of Hanbali Sharia (Saudi/Nigerian Sharia) and is only used in the severe fundamentalist nations.
What is being preached is the implementation of Hanafi Sharia which is the most liberal (used in Malaysia).
Maybe it's just me, but an article should be written on a subject with relevant context, not preying on the fears of Xenophobics (those who fear the unknown, just to be clear). I understand what you're trying to say, just find a better way to say it.
Dear Professor: RECENTLY WITHIN THE LAST month IN THE USA three men have been convicted of killing their wives, in one instance beheading and in an other instance killing the entire family. That is THREE in AMERICA. It goes on all the time in Pakistan, Libya, Iran, Irac, Turkey and even Israel. What on earth are you talking about? This is not a minority activity confined to small sections of the world. I am very interested in alerting people to the fact that Islam is already here, in our courts, in our government and in our communities. Folks SHOULD be afraid and if you have a better way to say it, bless you, start talking.
I should have articulated that these three men I mentioned above were Muslim and practicing Sharia Law in our country. American law finally caught up to them and they will no longer be a problem. Other practicers of Sharia Law have fled the country to escape punishment.
There are thousands of people being killed in every country every day by Muslims. It is not islolated, nor is it an act of the minority. It is huge. People are killed because they are infidels and the Koran calls for the destruction of infidels. Christians are slaughtered by the thousands and driven from their homes and their churches burned. Little children are bombed as they play in the school yard by Muslims. It is massive and it is certainly not confined to small areas of Nigeria. Giving Sharia regional names and assigning it to different parts of the world is obfuscation. It is wide spread throught the Middle East and Africa. It is what it is, a medieval, brutal form of dominance over the weak, women and children.
The Florida Supreme Court, and other courts across the country, do not get involved with lawsuits that involve the church. This is what separation of church and state means. There are several other cases like this, one is Franzen v. Poulos, where the court ordered that the Methodist Church needed to settle the dispute.
This happens with all church disputes.
Thank you for your comment, but this case is just the beginning. Governor Christi appointed a Muslim to the bench. We have Muslims in the White House involved with policy decisions. I'm not denegrating Muslims, I'm just saying they believe in SHaria Law above all other law, and THEIR STATED GOAL IS a world of Sharia Law which includes the USA. It is naive to think they just want to diddle around with religious and marital controversies when you can look at the UK. There are areas in europe that are posted, "Sharia Law" and you absolutely cannot enter unless you comply. We have areas in our country where Muslims rule with Sharia Law. There is a shopping center in NY, where no shop owners are allowed to sell products that are not approved by Muslims and Muslims have been trying for years to ban passengers from their taxis that carry wine, or even seeing eye dogs.
PS. Your interpretation of separation of church and state is incorrect. That law was to protect religions from intrusion by government, NOT to keep religion out of government.
You should probably study the Muslim movement into all countries. USA is just another target.
mslizzie,
I don't want to get on your wrong side because I sympathise with your concerns. But you seem to lack an understanding of your own country's political system.
I'm British, so if I'm wrong you need to correct me (although our respective countries share the same constitution - except you have the 'Bill of Rights').
Secularism (separation of church and state) does NOT allow religion into politics. (Unfortunately, here in England we do have a Christian presence in the House of Lords, but that is a historical presence rather than one of influence) A secular state is a stone wall between the two. There is no 'one way' door either way. Secularism ultimately protects the rights of individuals (not religions) and also ensures no one person has any rights ABOVE another.
Now, Sharia courts in the UK (and I'm presuming the US too) are set up so that Muslims can settle disputes according to the Quran (their religion). It is purely voluntary. Both parties must be willing to go through the Sharia court process to be legal according to the British legal system.
You wrote; "There are areas in europe that are posted, "Sharia Law" and you absolutely cannot enter unless you comply."
There was ONE area in London signed (with simple stick-on posters) "Sharia Controlled Zone". The source of the posters is debatable. Rumour has it that local fascists put them up to ridicule Sharia Law and Muslims (have you seen the posters?).
You also need to take a look at the other religious groups in your country. Scientologists, Mormons, Amish, etc. Are there not concerns there?
What about 'Intelligent Design'? If I were American I would be fighting to the death against introducing ID into the classroom!!!!!
There are many problems in the US. Sharia Law is just another one on the list.
Our government was founded on CHristian values. It is interwoven into all our founding documents, it is on our currency, our buildings. The success of our country depends on Christian values, morality, decency and the teachings of Christ. Our constitution was written to keep government from interfering into religion, it is not written to keep religion out of government. It has been distorted by left wing nuts like the ACLU and atheists. We need to put it back in every single public institution in this country including schools.
The First Amendment states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.”
At the time the constitution was written there were many sects of Christianity, so it would have been impossible to decide who's version of Christianity would be adopted without a fight (bearing in mind the constitution was written around the time of the American Civil War). Effectively, the 'right to bear arms' was included to allow people to defend themselves and their property (mainly against the British) at a delicate time in US history. And when you realise that there were only Christians living in America at that time, it was basically a law to allow Christians to defend themselves against other Christians!
I hope this demonstrates why it is SO important to keep religion out of politics. It is to protect YOU as much as it is to protect everyone else from religious discrimination. Allowing religion into government would not only open the door to Christianity but ALL other religions, including Islam!
I believe it is very important to keep the tenants of the Christian religion in politics. Our founders did not intend for religion to be erased from politics. They counted on morality, values and decency and used Christian doctrin as a background to write the founding documents.That certainly did not include Islam. Again our founding documents called for keeping government out of religion, not religion out of government.
Ms Dee Level 5 Commenter 14 months ago
A courageous hub about the truth! Also, I have seen that many Muslims may try to live peaceably with neighbors of other religions, but then when the imams in the mosques (as you say) get into stirring up extremism with the threat of not making it to heaven and being ostracized, take a different path.